Forum Replies Created
April 6, 2013 at 4:27 pm #21886
It did work. -)April 5, 2013 at 8:08 am #21884April 5, 2013 at 8:07 am #21883
My blog with pictures: http://exp30002.blogspot.com/April 2, 2013 at 9:02 am #21877
CSPI also claimed that Quorn could cause allergic reactions and should be removed from stores. Calling the product “fungus food”, CSPI claimed in 2003 that it “sickens 4.5% of eaters”. The manufacturer (Marlow Foods) disputes the figure, claiming that only 0.0007% (1 in 146,000) suffer adverse reactions and that the strain of fungus it uses does not produce toxins.
It is like the tobacco companies.April 2, 2013 at 8:37 am #21876
Allergy to peanuts affects 1.3% of the general population.
Peanut allergy affects 7 percent of brothers and sisters of
persons with the allergy.
(British Medical Journal 1996;313:518-521.)
Peanut Allergy Characteristics
Peanut allergy can be characterized by more severe symptoms, such as gastrointestinal,
skin and respiratory symptoms, than other food allergies and by a high rate of symptoms
on minimal contact.
(“Clinical characteristics of peanut allergy,” Clin. Exp. Allergy, 1997;
“An evaluation of the sensitivity of subjects with peanut allergy to very low doses of
peanut protein,” J. Allergy Clin. Immunol., 1997)
Severe sufferers also may experience potentially life-threatening anaphylactic shock in
response to ingestion of peanuts. Anaphylactic shock is an allergic reaction in which the
release of histamine causes swelling, difficulty in breathing, heart failure,
circulatory collapse, and sometimes death.
As many as one-third of peanut-sensitive patients have severe reactions,
such as fatal and near-fatal anaphylaxis. (“Anaphylactic deaths in asthmatic patients,”
Allergy Proc., 1989)
Avoidance of peanuts is very difficult because peanuts are commonly used as an adulterant
in the preparation of foods.
(Allergic reaction to inadvertent peanut contact in a child,” Allergy Asthma Proc., 1997)
About one in 140,000 consumers are sensitive to mycoproteins.
The Center for Science in the Public Interest claims this may result in
“vomiting, nausea, diarrhea, hives and potentially fatal anaphylactic reactions.”
1 in 140,000 is 7.1e-4 % = 0.00071 % as mycoprotein allergy.
compared to penut allergy of 1.3% in general population.
The comparison might be not correct by comparing general population(penut)
I would conclude that food allergy to penuts is probably a higher risk than food
allergy to mycoprotein.
To me mycoprotein is not an attractive food source, but it is a food source.
I am just probably not very hungry, and I have lots of other type of food to eat.April 1, 2013 at 4:34 pm #21874
did not work
it’s OKMarch 8, 2013 at 9:47 am #21808
How about ferrocement like that: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Vb1pdvvoVoQMarch 3, 2013 at 9:28 pm #21772
Diplomacy with WFS.March 3, 2013 at 9:19 pm #21771
May you payed scrap prices. Why would I pay scrap prices? I do not have the money. Do you?March 3, 2013 at 2:36 pm #21767
The plastic garbage is washed to shore on the Midway Islands.
The plastic platform can be coated with ferro cement to avoid UV degredation.
Or it can be coated using the biorock/seecreat thingy.
So there was a trawler and there is some garbage removal. -)) heheMarch 3, 2013 at 2:14 pm #21766
The MV Lyubov Orlova is far away from tropical waters. But , may be you can go grab it.
Let me know how that is working for you.
There are probably still signs and manuals on board. I do speak, read and write Russian also.March 3, 2013 at 9:52 am #21764
In my opinion, it might worth to consider anchoring a platform in deep sea.
There are 3000 meter long cables and ropes. Plastic ropes could be that
long. How much would it cost? How bulky it is? What kind of anchor to use?
What kind of living things could be harmed by it? Who knows?March 3, 2013 at 9:46 am #21763
Good work finding sea mounts. I use the International Seabed Authority interactive map
Original difficulty is; constructing and launching the first platform. The Midway Island could be
a place to do that, and the plastic garbage could be a good resource. Plastic garbage could be
recycled into platforms. Platforms could be launched and towed to positions you have mentioned.
Positions would be outside US EEZ. Platforms could be anchored at those sea mounts.
People could live on the platforms and collect more plastic and make more platforms.
There is enough plastic garbage in the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. Estimates I have seen,
are between 3.6 and 100 million tons.March 2, 2013 at 10:29 am #21760
Charles Moore has estimated the mass of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch at 100 million tons, which would be several tons per km2 .March 1, 2013 at 9:36 am #21748
To melt the plastic garbage:
A small scale solar oil heater. Similar idea to the: Solar Energy Generating Systems (SEGS) in California,
It just would be on much smaller scale and possible to take apart and put together. The use of organic oil
would be better for Eco-friendly use. It would be used only for melting the plastic, no electric generation.
People would be needed to go to Midway and pickup the plastic garbage and melt it.
I am not sure how big is the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. I am not sure how long it would take to keep
picking up the plastic garbage on the island, and how much garbage there would be.
But this would be an effort. And for the duration of such an effort the garbage would be less on the island.