1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar




Ken Sims

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 283 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #26046
    Profile photo of Ken Sims
    Ken Sims
    Keymaster

    The new forum is now open for use at http://discuss.seasteading.org/.

    #26045
    Profile photo of Ken Sims
    Ken Sims
    Keymaster

    This topic is continued at Casting Call: TV Series Seeks Seasteaders in the new forum system.

    #26044
    Profile photo of Ken Sims
    Ken Sims
    Keymaster

    This topic is continued at Casting concrete structures up from the sea floor in the new forum system.

    #26043
    Profile photo of Ken Sims
    Ken Sims
    Keymaster

    This topic is continued at Seasteading return on investment, investment risk, opt in, opt out in the new forum system.

    #26042
    Profile photo of Ken Sims
    Ken Sims
    Keymaster

    This topic is continued at Solving the bottleneck cast structures at sea in the new forum system.

    #26041
    Profile photo of Ken Sims
    Ken Sims
    Keymaster

    This topic is continued at What needs to be done to make seasteading investment worthy in the new forum system.

    #26040
    Profile photo of Ken Sims
    Ken Sims
    Keymaster

    This topic is continued at What defines a seastead in the new forum system.

    #26038
    Profile photo of Ken Sims
    Ken Sims
    Keymaster

    These forums are now read-only (except for admin postings).

    #26012
    Profile photo of Ken Sims
    Ken Sims
    Keymaster

    New user registrations on this system are now disabled.

    #25850
    Profile photo of Ken Sims
    Ken Sims
    Keymaster
    Ken, that is a problem because the idea of having a seasteading forum is obviously to become a reference point where investors and developers can meet and interchange ideas, present projects, and press agents can get informed.

     
    Sorry, but I don’t agree with this for several reasons.
     
    1. The forum is for people with an interest in seasteading to have a place to discuss it. A major investor isn’t necessarily going to have any interest in seasteading as such.
     
    2. If an investor is seriously considering investing in a seasteading project, they aren’t going to want to discuss the details where other people can read it.
     
      BuddyPress supports hidden Groups and Discourse supports secured Categories, BUT … investors aren’t going to want even other investor to have access to their discussions, so that would mean a hidden Group or a secured Category for each investor. Any major investor probably already has some facility set up for private discussions. And even if not, it’s simpler to just use email.
     
    3. Press agents in general are as unlikely to come here looking for news as major investors to come here looking for projects to invest in. And any major investor is going to have an a PIO who can get the word out much better than posting it in a forum.

    #25772
    Profile photo of Ken Sims
    Ken Sims
    Keymaster

    The first thing that any *real* major investor is going to want to see is an actual business plan, not photos. A real business plan with real numbers which shows that there is a reasonable expectation of a worthwhile return on the investment.
     
    This includes not just the project costs (though those are obviously very important) but also the expected revenue and who the customers are going to be. This includes marketing plans to reach the customers and research to demonstrate that the customers will actually buy.
     
    “If you build it, they will come.” isn’t a marketing plan, and it’s just a “Field Of Dreams” and for a major investor would serve only to prove that it is not a project to seriously consider.
     
    I really doubt that any *real* major investor has ever visited these forums. But if they did, a quick perusal of most of these forum topics would sending them fleeing.

    #25353
    Profile photo of Ken Sims
    Ken Sims
    Keymaster

    It was KatOnTri, not Tree.
     
    She did not change her display name; she deleted her account.
     
    Deleting her account did not delete any of her forum posts. It just makes them show as “Anonymous” and the name is not clickable.
     
    As far as I’m aware, she is not here as a registered user.

    #25344
    Profile photo of Ken Sims
    Ken Sims
    Keymaster
    Where is KatOnTree anyways???

     
    KatOnTri deleted her account quite some time back. The posts that she made while she was a registered user now show as Anonymous.
     
    When she asked me how to delete her account, I told her, but I also recommended that she take a break from the forums for a few weeks, or even a few months, and then decide if she really want to delete her account. But she chose to delete her account immediately.

    #24749
    Profile photo of Ken Sims
    Ken Sims
    Keymaster

    Scott, thanks for your response.
     
    Leaving WordPress entirely was part of the evaluation. Even though it appears likely that only the forums will leave and that everything else will stay on WordPress, still we’re not planning to actually integrate it with WordPress.
     
    (Even though the bulk of the website will probably stay on WordPress, there is still evaluation going on of some changes to make the website work with mobile devices. I’m only minimally involved with that aspect.)
     
    The WordPress stuff is hosted on WP Engine, a hosting service specifically for WordPress.
     
    We would not self-host Discourse. It was recommended that we use a hosting service called Discourse Hosting:
    https://www.discoursehosting.com/
    and it appears that they actually use Digital Ocean.
     
    Ken

    #24745
    Profile photo of Ken Sims
    Ken Sims
    Keymaster

    @ellmer … You have missed the point of this thread.
     
    The bbPress plugin that runs the forums sucks. (In my opinion anyway.)
     
    Part of keeping participants is having software that works well.
     
    Beyond that, these forums are what the users make them. TSI does not have the staff to be actively involved in the forums. And at the time when the issue arose, the majority of the users wanted the forums to be the Wild Wild West … no moderation except in extreme cases.
     
    And that’s fine with me. I volunteered as the primary spamfighter, not as a moderator. (I consider dealing with spam to be primarily an admin function, not a moderator function.)
     
    Discourse has a “Trust System” and “Community Moderation” that hopefully will allow the forum participants to better engage in self-moderation.
    http://www.discourse.org/about/
     
    Anyway, I’m not looking for opinions on how the forums should be run or what it takes to makes them good.
     
    I’m looking specifically for opinions about the Discourse software from people who have had experience with it.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 283 total)



Posted on at

Categories:

Written by

Blog/Newsletter