Forum Replies Created
April 20, 2012 at 6:03 am #20156
“What links, if any do you have?”
No links. No edit.April 19, 2012 at 8:55 am #20106
“On that basis, it would be impossible to give fully-informed consent to being part of any seastead, or any organization of any kind.”
True. The best route is to have full consent for every action. This would require a vote by all. If full consent is not realized, then force needs to be used against those who do not agree. Since you are doing something against someone’s will.April 19, 2012 at 8:33 am #20105
ugh…I cannot believe we cannot edit or preview our posts.
I was trying to point to this pic:
http://www.featurepics.com/FI/Thumb300/20061029/Six-Pack-Holder-123709.jpgApril 19, 2012 at 8:32 am #20104
Since you are recycling, do you think the six pack holders would be strong enough to keep the bottles together?
If they are still around anyway…April 18, 2012 at 1:26 pm #20046
Ahh. I am in complete support of people joining any group for which they know what they are getting into before they go into it.
So they can say “you will be a slave if you come on our seastead”. If you get on the seastead you have made the choice to become a slave/live under communism.
But you do not have “fully-informed consent” as in, you are not fully informed on what the central group will decide upon in the future. You may go on there expecting a communist utopia and then the central group decides that they want that crazy free market capitalism to take over. You go from sitting there asking for free handouts to being expected to put in some effort in exchange for stuff.April 18, 2012 at 7:06 am #20044
“What about a communist seastead with fully-informed consent?”
Full consent of all is ideal for any sort of government. I have tried to figure out a voting system where full consent would pass laws but I cannot get past the fact that infiltration by someone acting against the group can always be that single “no” vote just to harm the group.April 18, 2012 at 6:51 am #20043
They look pretty solid and when floating should provide a fairly flat surface which is handy.
My only worry (other than the bottle caps rusting out) would be the price of the cable ties. $6 per block may not seem like much, but scaling up it is a lot. You may want to look into what the bulk pricing may be or if there is something similar that is cheaper. If the price drops significantly for large quantities then it is nothing to worry about.
Try testing out the 7 connected first. It should give you a good idea of how they will act when connected.April 17, 2012 at 1:54 pm #20029
Will there be some sort of interface with some sort of machines or robots which can punish those who do not conform?
With communism you must use fear and pain to motivate people. Communism takes reward out of the productivity equation so you must have a good method of instilling fear into people in order for them to be productive.
Unless you just want an unproductive society and everyone starves and dies. Probably a better option than the fear option. More humane too.April 12, 2012 at 6:15 am #19991
“If they rule against floating homes being houses won’t this set a legal precedent and be really difficult to change in the future? If they rule against seasteading then all floating homes will have to be mobile right? The out of sight out of mind idea for floating homes makes sense to me until cities are ready to accept floating homes as houses.”
This will mainly determine what is a home and what is a vessel.
If a floating home is designated a vessel, then it does not necessarily mean that it will have to be mobile, it will just have to follow all of the laws that a vessel has. And it will lose all the rights you get from a home (ie. the government may board your vessel at any time to inspect it, etc.).
There is a give and take for each type of definition. A home can have property taxes levied upon it and can be subject to local jurisdiction house laws (water restrictions, visual restrictions, etc.). A vessel can be treated like an object and seized or moved as needed.
Of course, this is all for floating homes within a state’s jurisdiction. This mainly concerns those who wish to build something and start out close to shore before developing something to be miles out to sea.April 4, 2012 at 3:02 pm #19793
“Even $200 or $300 total cost for a seastead I can camp on with a tent is till a pretty good deal.”
It sounds like that is the initial goal of many of us here for our prototypes.
It would be interesting to see if the Seasteading Institute could put up a challenge of paying $1,000 each toward potential applicants to make a seastead that is good enough to spend the night on with a tent.
Then they can designate a judge to go spend the night at each of these seasteads and rate them and give the winner/s a prize.
It would probably kick a few of us into high gear to get something going by this summer.April 4, 2012 at 6:16 am #19783
Just a quick question…how are you sealing your bottles?
Glass should hold up long term to saltwater but any type of metal or plastic will be gone within a year.
My cheap grill fell into the canal about half a year ago and instead of pulling it out I kept it in just to observe how long it would take for it to completely dissolve. It is certainly rusted at this point and not all there. Most likely within the year it will not resemble a grill anymore.
Considering you do not have too much pressure against just the tips, I would suggest mixing a very wet batch of ferrocement and just dip the ends in it to at least coat the metal part. That could work.
I try to think of seasteads as something that should last close to 100 years. Maybe this is a poor assumption with such a new concept.April 2, 2012 at 1:25 pm #19761
Well, I am glad that at least the Supreme Court will have a say into what is a vessel and what is a house. At least to have some clarity and be able to work along the lines on either side whether I want to pay taxes on a home or adhere to the guidelines of owning a vessel.
I thought of another thing that I could not figure out if it needs to be registered. Those shuttle craft boats that have no propulsion but you use your jetski to move it. I do know that California considers those as a vessel that needs to be registered.
I hate when “intent” is involved with law. It relies upon what someone may be thinking which is akin to laws against certain thought.
I do not know how I would differentiate between a vessel and a home. It will not be an easy task and I look forward to the outcome of the Supreme Court decision for some clarity.March 27, 2012 at 7:56 pm #19554
Good job getting started with experimenting. Glass is an interesting material to test. I suppose it should last in salt water, but the obvious question would be durability. Huge waves crashing against something over and over needs to be durable.
This could definitely be a great option for a cheap platform in steady water or behind a breakwater.
I like the mangrove testing. I am curious to see how long it takes for them to grow. Where are you growing them? Saltwater?March 22, 2012 at 9:27 pm #19486
Phase 2 complete. Much learned in the process.
7 spheres connected, awkwardly held my 190 lbs.
Gathering supplies for Phase 3. Assembly line plan figured out.March 15, 2012 at 9:57 am #19421
Ahh, I was wondering if there was a legal advantage.
Where I live the water is shallow (around 10-20 ft) to about 30-40 miles out. It is probably like that down on the Gulf side near Miami.