New government, new opportunities, same people cause wars

Syndicate replies to “New government, new opportunities, same people cause wars” topic

This topic is about human nature. No matter what people think of, there is few drawbacks that will need to be overcome. Here's a short list of human shortcomings, I decided to publish here, because if you're going to try something new like this, why not take improving ourselves into account:

  • People make bad decisions. Did you know: if you were served food on a bigger plate, you would eat more? And if you had to choose from too many options, you would go for the default option? Even if it was the worst option? Problem: Our brains are wired for inactivity, e.g. stay with the default options. A book was published about this, I forgot the title. (Im posting this here when I remember).
  • People are born into top-down hierarchies. I have heard some people argument any hierarchy is unnatural to human beings. Don't be fooled: you were born into one: the natural family hierarchy (you-father-grandfather, the grandma, the mother, the daughter). Problem: we are wired for seeking and accepting hierarchy.
  • People need linear cause-and-effect explanations. If something happens, something must have caused it. That's the reason so many people believe in god(s) or accept any other belief system. This desire for linear causality is also based on how we are born: as living organisms we see baby's born, grow up, give birth themselves and die. As we try to explain our environment, we use that as our reference point. Problem: the innate desire for linear causality makes us believe in the wrong explanations for larger than life phenomena.
  • People are born into families and extended groups. This is why we need to 'feel part of something'. Like a school, religion, ethnic group. Something needs to give us an identity, we can't just be ourselves. All sorts of nationalism, racism, religious zelotism, are all caused by this need to be part of something.
  • People are driven by fear and laziness.
  • People need to feel special.
  • Etc.
  • Etc.

The list could go on and on. But there is a point I'm tryin to make here: Whatever kind of government system we think of, it must accept human shortcomings and work with them.

I believe modern democracy is in a state of constant denial, believe people are perfect beings able to make the right decisions, motivated by honour and equality. But that is all bullshit, and why all government fails.

 

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Precisions

"Our brains are wired for inactivity"

And that's a good thing, because it avoids, in most situations, our feeling miserable. Imagine how sad the life of a slug with the consciousness of a human would be.

"We are wired for seeking and accepting hierarchy."

... until we emancipate. The truely natural course is to be a subordinate of our parents throughout childhood, then reach adulthood and take the place or role that suits us better, or get away and thrive on our own, or whatever does not simpl fit into the existing hierarchy. A persistent hierarchal system implies that its peopel remain in their current age-set permanently, that's why states evolve into nannystates over time, and indirectly cause their citizens to stay childish for longer and longer, while teenagers become more and more twisted and depressed.

In any case, as a revolutionary anarchist I have no problem with hierarchies, as long as they're justified by unanimous consent.

"The innate desire for linear causality makes us believe in the wrong explanations for larger than life phenomena."

Yup, and that's what Discordianism aims to fix.

Dystopian Utopias

Every Utopian idea tried so far has failed because it aimed at some point to change the basic nature of humans. Human nature changes slowly and incrementally. Realistically, all one should expect from a seastead is something a bit better, both for one personally and to provide an example.