http://www.physorg.com/news164458857.html
It’s sitting at 6% efficiency right now, but these can go in places a lot of other cells cannot.
Thoughts?
Marginal improvements in efficiency are not what is keeping solar cells from being effective. 5%, 6% or 20% isnt the point: The point is 100k per square meter or 50 cents per square meter.
Polymer solar cells are cheaper than most, if not all, of the other solar alternatives… or so the article states.
__________________________________________________
There is no fate but what we make for ourselves. Each to his fate.
Polymer solar cells are cheaper than most, if not all, of the other solar alternatives… or so the article states.
I know, thats what makes them interesting, in my opinion. One could expect a news-article along the lines of: production process improved to reduce cost of polymer solar cells by an order of magnitude.
That would be cool. An extra percentge of efficiency under laboratory conditions? Meh.