Feedback request about web forums
Home › Forums › Community › Feedback for TSI › Feedback request about web forums
This topic has 1 voice, contains 18 replies, and was last updated by
admiral-doty 1023 days ago.
| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
| Author | Posts |
| November 22, 2008 at 10:17 am #755 | |
|
jhogan |
Hello all, My name is James Hogan, and I work with TSI as a voulnteer coordinator. I’d like to kick off a discussion about our web forums. Many of you would agree that our current forums aren’t very good. We intend to do an upgrade of some sort soon. The question is, to what? We’d really value feedback from the community on this before we choose a direction. Please post your thoughts here by next Wednesday, 11/26. If there is lots of feedback, we may keep the thread open longer — but we’re anxious to pick a direction and start making improvements, too! If you’re willing to volunteer to help implement a solution, we could use help there, as well. Complaints I’ve seen about the current forums include: Is this mostly complete? Or would there be a hundred more issues if we actually tried to create an exhaustive list? There are a number of options for upgrading: Thoughts? Thanks, |
| November 22, 2008 at 12:03 pm #4301 | |
|
Carl-Pålsson |
Ah, great. I managed to erase my rather long reply…. In a nutshell, get rid of drupal and get a more standardized (and production tested) flat forum software. Try to keep the clean uncluttered layout though, that is one of the good things about the current forum. If there is a way of integrating all the different parts of the TSI that contains discussions that would be cool (forums, blog, wiki). I´m really not sure if this is possible though. The current website is rather fragmented… No to categories/subforums. |
| November 22, 2008 at 12:10 pm #4302 | |
|
Eelco |
Maybe not a forum thing per se, but it does significantly detract from my forum experience: speed. Although it seems to be pretty good the past days, ive often had to wait a minute for loading a page with only text on it. |
| November 22, 2008 at 4:49 pm #4303 | |
|
jhogan |
Eelco — when you say that the site speed is pretty good the past days, how long as had it been good? For example, has it been months since you’ve seen a problem, indicating that this might have fixed itself? Or is this still an issue? Do you have any other details you can give? e.g. when the site is slow, does it seem to pop back to normal speed a few minutes later? Or does it stay slow or a day or two at a time? Do you notice the slowness in any particular areas of the site more than others? Thanks. |
| November 22, 2008 at 7:05 pm #4305 | |
|
Wayne-Gramlich |
The reason why getting individual posts to show up as E-mail messages is important to me is because it allows me to use a threaded E-mail reader (Thunderbird). This means I do not have to learn the quirks of N different web forum sites. Instead, I learn how to use my E-mail reader. I am literally on dozens of Yahoo groups and it occupies only 10-15 minutes a day to track them all. When it comes to posting, I have no problems with going to a web site, logging on, and posting. The volume of posts by me is way way less than the total number of incoming messages. |
| November 22, 2008 at 9:36 pm #4306 | |
|
Carl-Pålsson |
Can´t you read RSS feeds with Thunderbird? I haven´t tried it myself but I would think most decent forum software would support this feature. e.g. http://fluxbb.org/forums/feed/rss/ |
| November 22, 2008 at 9:47 pm #4307 | |
|
Carl-Pålsson |
Just adding some more suggestions here…
|
| November 23, 2008 at 6:58 am #4310 | |
|
Wayne-Gramlich |
I’m running a somewhat older Linux distrabution, Kubuntu 710 (Hardy Heron), and I am running Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (20080925). I’ve never gotten RSS feeds to work for Thunderbird. For an RSS feed reader I use Akregator 3.5.8 (I think). It actually works, but is leaves a lot to be desired. |
| November 23, 2008 at 11:32 am #4311 | |
|
Jeff-Chan |
Does Google or Yahoo have free forums we can use? There ought to be an acceptable free (advertising supported?) solution somewhere. This is something that would seem to be much better to outsource than to administer ourselves. Wikipedia maybe? |
| November 23, 2008 at 12:25 pm #4313 | |
|
Eelco |
Good questions: i was only commenting on the past days, as they are still in my short term memory. Not sure about the medium term actually, but i do know that a few months ago, it was really bad. The way it is now for me at the moment is ok. |
| November 23, 2008 at 8:39 pm #4316 | |
|
Christian-Siegert |
Test forumWe should use a real forum software, like vBulletin or phpBB. I have set up a phpBB test forum. Take some time to get to know it (start threads, reply, post stuff to see whether the forum is sufficient for our needs, etc.) Please be aware that the test forum has not been customized yet. User accountsYou can either register or use the test account:
You can make changes if you want (name, new forums, etc.), log in as adminstrator:
If I get a copy of the database of the current forum I can try to write a converter, so we can transfer the threads/posts to the new forum. |
| November 23, 2008 at 11:22 pm #4317 | |
|
Eelco |
Great job, thanks for taking the time to do this! Hard to comment on what its like to use it yet, but its gets high marks for snappiness. |
| November 24, 2008 at 5:53 pm #4319 | |
|
bhuga |
Thanks for the feedback. I opened a ticket to look into the performance. |
| November 24, 2008 at 6:17 pm #4320 | |
|
Joep |
Here: http://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=489446 |
| November 24, 2008 at 6:19 pm #4321 | |
|
duffomelia |
Another option is to use the open source code that runs a website like the following: http://theconnectedrepublic.org/ as a starting point and then customize it as necessary. It’s kinda like tumblr for forums. I like it because it has a simple, clean interface that’s easy to navigate without little sub-sections everywhere which can be difficult to find. There are discussions that people can create, comment on, and tag. That’s it. Admins can mark some discussion as featured. Then some users might care about the important featured stuff and others can browse around all of the discussions. I think you want to make it quite easy for users to contribute content without them having to classify it and figure out where on earth to put. Let them get the content in there and then be smart about how to present and how to allow them to navigate. |
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
©2012 The Seasteading Institute