big guns
This topic has 1 voice, contains 16 replies, and was last updated by 
Pastor_Jason 578 days ago.
 tusavision |
 Pastor_Jason |
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
big guns
Home › Forums › Research › Law and Politics › big guns
This topic has 1 voice, contains 16 replies, and was last updated by Pastor_Jason 578 days ago.
| Author | Posts |
|---|---|
| Author | Posts |
| October 21, 2010 at 8:09 pm #11652 | |
| tusavision | The columbians wouldn’t be building narco-subs if submarines were not super effective equalizers in naval power. The only reason we even have real ships in modern navy’s any more is because they’re cheap in contrast to submarines and an effective means of subjugating shit farmers. Any conflict between first world countries has the above water ships safely in harbour while the submarines duke it out. Above water seasteads are harbor/EEZ babies. Period. End of story. Oh wait. You’re serious… Let me laugh even harder. I’m not a troll… I’m you! |
| October 22, 2010 at 12:51 pm #11659 | |
| Pastor_Jason | The columbians wouldn’t be building narco-subs if submarines were not super effective equalizers in naval power. They use semi-subs because they are very difficult to detect, not because they have any offensive capability. They are built so cheaply you could sink one with small arms fire. The only reason we even have real ships in modern navy’s any more is because they’re cheap in contrast to submarines and an effective means of subjugating shit farmers. Any conflict between first world countries has the above water ships safely in harbour while the submarines duke it out. A simple way of explaining a complex truth… but valid none the less. Above water seasteads are harbor/EEZ babies. Period. End of story. *COUGH* Sub-Steads! *COUGH* Live Well! -Jason |
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
©2012 The Seasteading Institute