1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar




big guns

Home Forums Research Law and Politics big guns

This topic contains 16 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by Avatar of Pastor_Jason Pastor_Jason 3 years, 9 months ago.

Viewing 2 posts - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #11652
    Avatar of tusavision
    tusavision
    Participant

    The columbians wouldn’t be building narco-subs if submarines were not super effective equalizers in naval power.

    The only reason we even have real ships in modern navy’s any more is because they’re cheap in contrast to submarines and an effective means of subjugating shit farmers. Any conflict between first world countries has the above water ships safely in harbour while the submarines duke it out.

    Above water seasteads are harbor/EEZ babies. Period. End of story.

    Oh wait. You’re seriousLet me laugh even harder.

    I’m not a troll… I’m you!

    #11659
    Avatar of Pastor_Jason
    Pastor_Jason
    Participant

    The columbians wouldn’t be building narco-subs if submarines were not super effective equalizers in naval power.

    They use semi-subs because they are very difficult to detect, not because they have any offensive capability. They are built so cheaply you could sink one with small arms fire.

    The only reason we even have real ships in modern navy’s any more is because they’re cheap in contrast to submarines and an effective means of subjugating shit farmers. Any conflict between first world countries has the above water ships safely in harbour while the submarines duke it out.

    A simple way of explaining a complex truth… but valid none the less.

    Above water seasteads are harbor/EEZ babies. Period. End of story.

    *COUGH* Sub-Steads! *COUGH*

    Live Well!

    -Jason

Viewing 2 posts - 16 through 17 (of 17 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.



Posted on at

Categories:

Written by

Blog/Newsletter

Donate